Fit & sizing

What Size Am I in Vintage? Why the Label Can't Tell You

5 min read August 20, 2026

The short answer

The number on a vintage label is not a size. The US sizing standard, Commercial Standard CS 215-58, was published in 1958, reissued in 1971 as the voluntary PS 42-70, and withdrawn entirely in January 1983 — nothing mandatory replaced it. Since then a size mark has recorded one manufacturer's private decision in a market with no referee, so the same number drifts between decades and between brands. Measure the garment instead: chest armpit to armpit, shoulder to shoulder, sleeve length and total length — then compare those four numbers against a coat you already own and like the fit of.

Editorial photograph by Pexels Contributor, The Good Old — Anemoia Vestiaire
Photograph by Pexels Contributor

The honest starting point is that the number on a vintage label is not a size. It is a number that meant something specific in the decade it was printed, under a standard that no longer exists, in a country that may not be yours. Two garments marked 12, made twenty years apart, can differ by several inches through the chest.

There was a standard, and it was thrown away

The United States did once have a national sizing system. It came out of a body-measurement study conducted in 1939. Statisticians reduced the survey down to five figures they judged sufficient to describe a woman's size and shape: weight, height, bust girth, waist girth and hip girth. The National Bureau of Standards distributed the results to the garment industry in 1953, the industry formally accepted them in 1957, and in 1958 they were published as Commercial Standard CS 215-58.

It was revised in 1971, when the Department of Commerce reissued it as PS 42-70 under a new name, the Voluntary Product Standard. The word voluntary is doing the work in that sentence. Manufacturers had already begun ignoring the recommendations through the 1970s, and in January 1983 the standard was withdrawn altogether.

Nothing mandatory replaced it. The American Society for Testing and Materials published voluntary standards in 1995 — including, sensibly, a separate set acknowledging that body shape changes with age — and revised them in 2011 and again in 2021. Most companies do not use them.

What that means for a garment on a rail

It means the label records a manufacturer's private decision, taken in a particular year, in a market with no referee. Since 1983 the pressure on that decision has run one way: a label that flatters sells better than one that does not. The drift is real and it is well documented in the trade. What is not well documented is the exact conversion — you will find charts online claiming a given decade's 12 equals a modern 6, and they are guesses dressed as data.

One figure is worth quoting because it comes from the standard itself rather than from a chart: under the measurements set out in CS 215-58, the average 155-pound woman should have been wearing a size 16. She is now more likely to be buying a 10.

So the drift is not a rumour. But the specific number on the garment in front of you cannot be converted by formula, because there is no formula — only a manufacturer, a year, and a decision nobody was obliged to justify.

Measure the garment, not yourself

The way out of this is simple and slightly unglamorous. Stop asking what size a piece is and start asking what it measures. A tape measure is not affected by fashion, marketing or the year of manufacture.

Four measurements settle most garments. Take them flat, on a table, with the piece closed and smoothed but not stretched, and double the ones that go across the body.

Chest, armpit to armpit

Lay the garment flat and measure straight across from one underarm seam to the other. Double it for the full circumference. This is the single most useful number on a coat, and the one most often missing from a listing.

Shoulder to shoulder

Across the back, from the point where one shoulder seam meets the sleeve to the same point on the other side. This is the measurement that decides whether a coat will ever look right on you, because it is the one thing a tailor cannot easily change.

Sleeve length

From the shoulder seam to the cuff. On a raglan or a dropped shoulder there is no seam to start from, so measure from the base of the collar instead and say which method you used — the two are not comparable.

Total length

From the base of the collar at the back down to the hem. This tells you where a coat will sit on you, which for outerwear is most of the silhouette.

Then compare it to something you already own

Not to a size chart. Take a coat from your own wardrobe that fits the way you want the new one to fit, measure it the same four ways, and compare the numbers directly. This removes every variable at once — your body, the decade, the country, the manufacturer's opinion of what 12 means.

It also handles the thing charts cannot: ease. A 1960s cocoon coat and a 1990s tailored overcoat can share an identical chest measurement and feel nothing alike, because one was cut to hang away from the body and the other to follow it. Comparing garment to garment captures that. Comparing your body to a chart does not.

What measurements will not tell you

They are not the whole answer, and it is worth being clear about the limits.

They do not describe drape. A heavy melton and a fluid crepe with the same numbers will sit differently on the same shoulders. They do not account for what is worn underneath — a coat measured for a shirt is a different coat over a thick knit. They say nothing about how a silhouette was designed to be worn, and vintage silhouettes were often designed around undergarments that are no longer in use.

They also cannot be taken from a photograph. If a listing does not give measurements, no amount of looking will supply them.

Sizing marks from other countries and other decades

A German 40, an Italian 44, a French 40 and a British 12 are not interchangeable, and the conversions published today were built for current garments. Applied backwards to a coat made in 1975 they carry the same problem as domestic sizing: they assume a standard that the garment was never made to.

Treat a foreign size mark the same way as a domestic one — as a clue about where and roughly when a piece was made, not as an instruction. On older European outerwear the mark is often the only surviving evidence of origin, which makes it interesting, but it still is not a fit.

The short version

The label is a historical artefact. The measurements are the fact. Where a listing gives them, use them and compare against a garment you own. Where it does not, ask before you buy rather than after — for a one-of-a-kind piece there is no second one to exchange it for, and a question costs nothing.

Measurements are noted on listings where we have them, and where they are not shown you can ask us through the chat or the contact form and we will measure the piece for you. For the practical side of judging fit before you commit, read how to know if a vintage piece will fit you. Or start with the overcoats, where the four numbers above matter most.

Common questions

What size am I in vintage clothing?

There is no reliable answer in size numbers, because vintage labels were printed under standards that no longer exist. The workable method is to ignore the label, take four measurements from the garment — chest armpit to armpit, shoulder to shoulder, sleeve length and total length — and compare them against a garment you already own that fits the way you want.

Why don't vintage sizes match modern sizes?

Because the standard that once governed them was abandoned. The United States published Commercial Standard CS 215-58 in 1958, revised it in 1971 as PS 42-70, and withdrew it in January 1983. Nothing mandatory took its place, so since then each manufacturer has decided privately what a number means, and the pressure has consistently run towards flattering labels.

When did clothing sizes stop being standardised?

January 1983, when the US voluntary standard was formally withdrawn. The garment industry had already begun ignoring it during the 1970s. The American Society for Testing and Materials published voluntary standards in 1995 and revised them in 2011 and 2021, but most companies do not use them.

What measurements should I check before buying vintage online?

Four cover most garments, all taken flat with the piece closed and smoothed but not stretched. Chest, measured straight across from underarm seam to underarm seam and doubled. Shoulder to shoulder, across the back between the shoulder seams. Sleeve length from the shoulder seam to the cuff. Total length from the base of the collar to the hem.

How do I know if a vintage coat will fit without trying it on?

Measure a coat you already own that fits the way you want the new one to fit, and compare the two sets of numbers directly. This removes your body, the decade, the country and the manufacturer's opinion from the calculation in one step. It also captures ease — how far the cut hangs away from the body — which a size chart cannot.

Do European vintage sizes convert to modern sizes?

Not reliably. A German 40, an Italian 44, a French 40 and a British 12 are not interchangeable, and published conversion tables were built for current garments. Applied backwards to a coat made decades ago they carry the same flaw as domestic sizing: they assume a standard the garment was never made to. Treat a foreign size mark as evidence of where and roughly when a piece was made, not as a fit.

What can measurements not tell you about fit?

They do not describe drape — a heavy melton and a fluid crepe with identical numbers sit differently on the same shoulders. They do not account for what is worn underneath. And they say nothing about how a silhouette was designed to be worn, which matters because vintage cuts were often built around undergarments no longer in use.

What should a beginner know about sizing before buying vintage online?

Three things. The label is a historical artefact, not an instruction. The measurements are the fact, so use them where a listing gives them. And where a listing does not give them, ask before buying rather than after — a one-of-a-kind piece has no second one to exchange it for.

Sources

Every piece in the archive is one of a kind. When it is gone, there is no second one.

Browse the overcoats